419 646 0004/Investigation

From otp22 db
Jump to: navigation, search
Investigation This is an investigation subpage.

The information found here includes bleeding-edge updates, information dumps, and speculation.
The factual/summarized article for this page is: 419 646 0004
Be sure to separate different subjects here using a new section and subtopics using ===Subsections===.


At approximately 21:20 Pacific Time on September 18th, "sauceman" on IRC reported locating another number, 419 646 0004

Here is UF trhead from that time: http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=965061#965061

 Both old numbers  (303) 309 0004 and (202)999 3335 had this massage on: "The number you have reached, 646-0004, is not in service.
 If you feel you have reached this recording in error, please check the number and dial again. Thank you."
 http://vocaroo.com/i/s0GPqljRIM2o   Possible hidden messages in 2029993335 09/17/2012 call window

Hidden Message

 [20:41] <sauceman> sounds like "There's an alarm in the Vaughnsville DCO"
 Suggestions for the meaning of DCO or TCO from jalime:  "CTO" Change Task Order, "CDO" Classified Documents Office, "DCO" Disconnect,
 Denver Co, Disaster Control Office, Document Change Offline, Delivery Control Office, Duty Carried Out
 also of note: [23:28] <chronomex> oh, DCO is a phone switch
 Area code for Vaughnsville is(419)
 [21:20] <sauceman> it's 419 646 0004
 [21:21] <sauceman> it's in this place called Vaughnsville
 [21:21] <sauceman> tiny place in Ohio
 [21:25] <sauceman> I dunno. My guess is that maybe the 303 number forwarded to that Vaughnsville place
 maqr has made a clearer recording which seems to confirm sauceman's suggestion. http://vocaroo.com/i/s0QenU7YvmSG 
 as of 2:11pm GMT there was a general consensus in chat that the Vaughnsville DCO idea is correct.


"wtfookin" had earlier analyzed the multi-frequency (MF) tones heard on a recording of the 202 number, before the female voice makes the "number not in service" message (source orignally http://pastebin.com/EZ9bf1Bg):

MF tones preceding "number out of service" message from 202 number:
tone 1: 1100 and 1699 Hz approx 100 ms 
tone 2:  700 and  899 Hz approx 70 ms
tone 3: 1100 and 1301 Hz approx 70 ms
tone 4: 1100 and 1301 Hz approx 70 ms
tone 5: 1301 and 1502 Hz approx 70 ms
tone 6: 1301 and 1504 Hz approx 70 ms
tone 7: 1301 and 1504 Hz approx 70 ms

Using SS5 (http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Signaling_System_No._5) to decode those tones gives

tone 1: C&F  13/code 13 keying prefix 1
tone 2: A&B  1
tone 3: C&D  6
tone 4: C&D  6
tone 5: D&E  0
tone 6: D&E  0
tone 7: D&E  0
tone 8: E&F  15/code 15 keying finish

As-of 22:00 US/Pacific the 419 number is producing the *SAME* tones (including the same noise bursts) previously heard on the 202 number. However, this number ALWAYS plays the "not in service" intercept, while the 202 number has only played it on occasion since it changed to a HUM just before 17180000Z SEPT. It is not known whether the 303 number ever plays this recording. overlap the hums from different times Tentative conclusions:

  1. the 419 and 202 numbers are controlled by the same party
  2. the "out of service" message is a recording being played back

See also

Info on NEW NUMBER 202 999 3335

m86's calls to various other (419) 646 numbers